<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Golden Globes Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelchall.org/2008/01/13/golden-globes-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelchall.org/2008/01/13/golden-globes-results/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:51:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandra</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelchall.org/2008/01/13/golden-globes-results/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelchall.org/news/2008/01/13/golden-globes-results/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Aw. :( I have to say I was quite disappointed by this year&#039;s Golden Globe winners. Although I have to say I&#039;m very pleased that Johnny Depp, &#039;Sweeney Todd&#039; and Cate Blanchett were recognized (ooh, and Dario Marianelli, who composed &#039;Atonement&#039;s&#039; absolutely beautiful score), the winners on the TV performance-side were less satisfying.

I mean, really, though. It angers me how many times excellent (and often supporting) roles are overlooked. When will Robert Sean Leonard be recognized for his portrayal of Wilson on &#039;House&#039;? When will Chloë Sevigny be recognized for her portrayal of Nicki on &#039;Big Love&#039;? When will Tricia Helfer be recognized for her portrayal of Number Six on &#039;Battlestar Galactica&#039;? And when, ohh when, will Michael C. Hall be recognized for his magnificent performance on &#039;Dexter&#039;? Yargh. Golden Globes are such a disappointment each year, I tell you.  :confused:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aw. :( I have to say I was quite disappointed by this year&#8217;s Golden Globe winners. Although I have to say I&#8217;m very pleased that Johnny Depp, &#8216;Sweeney Todd&#8217; and Cate Blanchett were recognized (ooh, and Dario Marianelli, who composed &#8216;Atonement&#8217;s&#8217; absolutely beautiful score), the winners on the TV performance-side were less satisfying.</p>
<p>I mean, really, though. It angers me how many times excellent (and often supporting) roles are overlooked. When will Robert Sean Leonard be recognized for his portrayal of Wilson on &#8216;House&#8217;? When will Chloë Sevigny be recognized for her portrayal of Nicki on &#8216;Big Love&#8217;? When will Tricia Helfer be recognized for her portrayal of Number Six on &#8216;Battlestar Galactica&#8217;? And when, ohh when, will Michael C. Hall be recognized for his magnificent performance on &#8216;Dexter&#8217;? Yargh. Golden Globes are such a disappointment each year, I tell you.  :confused:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mycah</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelchall.org/2008/01/13/golden-globes-results/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Mycah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelchall.org/news/2008/01/13/golden-globes-results/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Exactly :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riikka</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelchall.org/2008/01/13/golden-globes-results/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Riikka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelchall.org/news/2008/01/13/golden-globes-results/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately I pretty much saw this coming. The voters seem to favor safe and boring choices, like medical shows, leaving the truly refreshing and unique in the dark. :uhh:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately I pretty much saw this coming. The voters seem to favor safe and boring choices, like medical shows, leaving the truly refreshing and unique in the dark. :uhh:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

